Your business changes every week. Your understanding of its risks should keep up. Skadi runs AI-supported internal assessments on your own evidence — so you find gaps before an incident or an examiner does.
It covers a defined scope and period. Engineers join, infrastructure changes, vendors are introduced, and AI tools enter everyday workflows. An internal review gives management a way to assess controls between independent examinations — and to ask three questions.
A policy does not prove access is restricted, and a plan does not prove the team can execute it. We connect each control to real evidence — access lists, termination records, remediation tickets, and activity logs — and show the difference between what you intended and what happened.
The most valuable findings are rarely missing documents. They are conflicting records, excessive permissions, unclear ownership, or a process that has not kept up with the product — including AI data flows and agent permissions.
A missing policy acknowledgment and unrestricted production access should not carry equal weight. You get a short, defensible action list: what needs attention, why it matters, who owns it, and how to confirm the change worked.
Connect Drata, Vanta, or any GRC platform, or upload read-only exports. No GRC platform? We work with you to collect the evidence directly.
Evidence is organized and mapped to control requirements. Dates, records, and procedures are compared. Missing, outdated, or contradictory evidence is flagged as possible exceptions.
A flag is not a conclusion. A person validates the facts, assesses the significance, and records scope, evidence dates, and limitations — so every finding is easy to challenge and confirm.
Models run on AWS Bedrock, with no training on customer data and no model-provider retention. Skadi's basic retention is 30 days; longer retention only by written agreement.
Skadi automates the repetitive audit work so your team spends its time on decisions, not documents.
No black box: every automated result links back to the evidence it came from, so you can verify it yourself.
Start with a regular, risk-based cadence, then add focused reviews when something material changes.
Assess readiness, assign owners, and address gaps before relying on your controls.
Revisit access, configuration, monitoring, and change approval for the affected systems.
Check onboarding, role assignment, and access review coverage.
Review data flows, provider terms, agent permissions, and escalation paths.
Assess the affected controls and verify that corrective actions operate as intended.
An internal assessment helps you understand and improve your own controls. It does not issue a SOC 2 report, replace an independent CPA firm's testing, or shorten the period needed to demonstrate operating effectiveness.
SOC 2 Type II examinations are delivered on Skadi by a network of independent CPA audit firms. Skadi supports evidence analysis and the workflow; the independent firm applies professional judgment and takes responsibility for its report.
Instead of asking only "Are we ready for the auditor?", ask what you need to improve in your business right now.